Sections of this topic
This posting by: Tony Poderis
That riveting question was actually written in the marginal notes of a proposal asking for funding for an orchestra; and, it was written by a trustee of a grant-making foundation during a meeting to review the proposal in question.
Another trustee of the foundation, the one who presented the proposal on behalf of the orchestra, later showed that note to me and asked what I could do to help counter his colleague’s questioning remark.
Arts and cultural institutions are often forced into such defensive postures. They’re accused of only benefiting the elite. The needs of the hungry, the homeless, and the physically, mentally/emotionally challenged are cited as so great that something as “frivolous” as the arts should not be drawing from the pool of available arts support for non-profit organizations.
Those of us who work with … and passionately support the arts, are asked how we can justify “diverting” funds to the arts when such needs exist.
The arts community rightfully provides data showing its economic impact and benefit to the community—statistics tabulating the number of people employed by arts and cultural organizations, tourists attracted to the area, money spent on purchases from vendors, etc. Those facts deliver a true story, but they are not always compelling. Then there is the “quality-of-life” argument, but it, too, does not always convince. We’re told it is too subjective, too broad, too general.
I believe the answer is to stop defending the arts. We must step out of the defensive postures our critics would-and-do force us into. We need to start asserting the value of the arts with some questions of our own.
Would the community be a place that draws successful people able to support other needs, if there were not an orchestra, art museum, ballet, opera, theater, etc.? Without the quality-of-life amenities that arts and cultural organizations provide, would private companies, corporations, and firms be able to retain and attract key employees—the very people who keep business thriving and civic endeavors moving forward?
• Without the draw of arts and culture organizations, how many individuals of affluence would there be in the community?
• Would as many new enterprises choose to make the community their home?
• Without the retention of “old money” and the creation of new wealth, where would the philanthropy to support all those “more worthy” institutions come from?
• What would happen to the hospitals, schools, and social-service agencies? To me, the gist of the argument to make when the value of the arts is questioned is simple. Without the arts, without cultural institutions, the people who make up the strong backbone of support for civic and social needs would be far fewer in number.
It would be as if the community was trying to stand upright with vertebrae missing from that backbone of support. That leads to one last question.
How many vertebrae would have to go missing before that backbone collapsed under the weight of the load it was being asked to carry?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If you have a question or comment for Tony, he can be reached at [email protected]. There is also a lot of good fundraising information on his website: Raise-Funds.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Have you seen The Fundraising Series of ebooks ??
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If you’re reading this online and you would like to comment/expand on the above, or would just like to offer your thoughts on the subject of this posting, we encourage you to “Leave a Reply” at the bottom of this page, click on the feedback link at the top of the page, or send an email to the author of this posting. If you’ve received this posting as an email, click on the email link (above) to communicate with the author.
