A Capital Campaign Horror Story – In Three Parts, Part One

Sections of this topic

    (This is an email I’d received, with my comments in bold.)

    We are a small Historical Society that backed into a Capital Campaign when our current President and her husband donated $1M for a new vault and study center.

    A design and build Contractor on our Board did the best he could, without plans and specs, to estimate the cost of the structure. He came in at 1.2M. But apparently a number of things were not included in his estimate and the suspected cost is now 1.7 M. Before overruns.

    Our 2nd year of fundraising for this project only yielded $ 156,000 and $100,000 of that is from one donor.

    I gather that your organization did not have a Planning Study done to determine if and how a capital campaign could/would be successful.

    As there were no plans/specs, I don’t see how you can legitimately ask people to give to support a project the depth of which is unknown.

    It is my impression, just from your first paragraph, that the organization saw $1million on the table, and did no thinking or planning.

    It is my opinion, based on the above, that you should not have gotten into a capital campaign.

    Our Executive Director has told the Board that if we do not build within 2 years we have to start returning the money?? Is that true?

    I can’t say if there are any State laws that would required returning the donated funds within a specific time period – I don’t know !! I do know that, at the rate money is being raised, that your organization’s credibility is on shaky ground.

    Without a firm capital campaign plan, there is no way to know, to even
    have an idea when/if all the needed funds could/would be raised.

    Accepting contributions for a specific purpose, without being able to
    assure donors of a timeline for the use of those funds for that purpose,
    again brings your credibility into question.

    And, accepting such contributions and not using those funds for the
    intended purpose within a reasonable timeframe could border on fraud.

    With what you’ve told me, and if you can’t come up with a solid plan
    (based on reality, not wishful thinking) for raising ALL the needed funds
    within a reasonable timeframe, my reaction is to tell you to return the
    funds that have been contributed.

    So, though I don’t know your ED’s thought process, I must agree with the conclusion.

    Next Week – Part Two

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Have you heard about
    The Fundraising Series of ebooks?
    They’re easy to read, to the point, and inexpensive ($1.99-$4.99)

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Have a comment or a question about starting, evaluating
    or expanding your fundraising program?
    AskHank

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    We’ve been posting these pieces for the last five years,
    and we’re now at a point where, to keep this resource alive,
    we need your questions/problems to engender further discussion.
    Look forward to hearing from you.
    Comments & Questions

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    If you’re reading this on-line, and would like to comment/expand on the above piece, or would just like to offer your thoughts on the subject of this posting, we encourage you to “Leave a Reply.” If you’re reading this as an email, and you want to comment on the above piece, email Comments to offer your thoughts. Your comments, with appropriate attribution, could be the basis of a new posting.